Human prion interacts with chaperones of the Hsp60 family
Review of heat shock proteins, chaperones, and TSEs
Heat shock protein and scrapie

Prion protein PrPc interacts with molecular chaperones of the Hsp60 family.

Edenhofer F; Rieger R; Famulok M; Wendler W; Weiss S; Winnacker EL 
Laboratorium Fur Molekulare Biologie-Genzentrum-Institute
J Virol 70: 4724-8 (1996)
Prions mediate the pathogenesis of certain neurodegenerative diseases, including bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans. The prion particle consists mainly, if not entirely, of PrPSc, a posttranslationally modified isoform of the cellular host-encoded prion protein (PrPc). It has been suggested that additional cellular factors might be involved in the physiological function of PrPc and in the propagation of PrPSc. Here we employ a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid screen to search for proteins which interact specifically with the Syrian golden hamster prion protein. Screening of a HeLa cDNA library identified heat shock protein 60 (Hsp60), a cellular chaperone as a major interactor for PrPc. The specificity of the interaction was confirmed in vitro for the recombinant proteins PrPc23-231 and rPrP27-30 fused to glutathione S-transferase with recombinant human Hsp60 as well as the bacterial GroEL. The interaction site for recombinant Hsp60 and GroEL proteins was mapped between amino acids 180 and 210 of the prion protein by screening with a set of recombinant PrPc fragments. The binding of Hsp60 and GroEL occurs within a region which contains parts of the putative alpha-helical domains H3 and H4 of the prion protein.

Heat Shock Proteins, Chaperones and the Prion Encephalopathies

Nigel Kenward, Michael Landon, *Lajos Laszlo and R. John Mayer
Department of Biochemistry, U. of Nottingham Medical School and *Department of General Zoology, Lorand Eotvos University, Budapest H-1088, Hungary.

The discovery that the major difference between normal and disease-associated isoforms of PrP is in protein conformation (Pan et. al., 1993), led several researchers to hypothesise either that molecular chaperones may be involved in the folding of PrP, and hence the disease process, or that PrP itself was a chaperone that was misfolded in some way (Liautard, 1991).


While studying ubiquitin-protein conjugate immunoreactive inclusions in both Alzheimer's disease and scrapie-infected mouse brain, we discovered immunoreactive vesicular structures which are members of the endosome-lysosome system (Lowe et. al., 1990; Lowe et. al., 1992). These features were also seen independently in the human prion encephalopathy, Creutzfeldt Jakob disease (CJD) (Ironside et. al., 1993). Immunogold electron microscopy confirms the structures as members of the endosome-lysosome system, since they show immunoreactivity to the lysosome-specific enzyme beta-glucuronidase as well as to ubiquitin-protein conjugates; interestingly, they were also seen contain an hsp70 (Laszlo et. al., 1992; Arnold et. al., 1995).

We propose that the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc occurs in endosome-lysosome 'bioreactors', a hypothesis that is supported by independent biochemical studies. Similarly, an hsp70 is detected in endosome-lysosomes in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cells (Laszlo et. al., 1991).

Intracellular and extracellular proteins can be degraded by lysosomes (Dice, 1987) after delivery to the endosome-lysosome system by endocytosis, crinophagy, microautophagy, macroautophagy or by hsc73-mediated transport (for a review see Terlecky, 1994). Cytosolic proteins are known to be internalised and degraded in lysosomes in an hsc73-mediated fashion (Chiang et. al., 1989; Terlecky et. al., 1992) provided that they possess the specific peptide signal motif KFERQ or a related sequence (Terlecky et. al., 1992). While PrP does not contain this motif, the findings of Dice and colleagues indicate that a constitutively expressed hsp70 (hsc73) might be found in endosome-lysosomes in neurones and in lymphocytes.

If PrPSc is produced from PrPC at the cell surface or in endosome-lysosomes, then presumably heat shock proteins must either reside in these compartments (or their topological equivalents) or be able to enter such compartments in scrapie-producing cells. Clearly it must be established biochemically that heat shock proteins are indeed present in these organelles.


Recent studies on hsp28 and hsp72 in cell models of scrapie have shown a disease-specific modification in the heat shock response. In contrast to the situation in control N2a cells, hsp28 and hsp72 are not induced by heat shock in scrapie-infected N2a (ScN2a) cells (Tatzelt et. al., 1995); also the transcript of hsp72 is only seen in heat-shocked N2a cells. Tatzelt and co-authors offer several possible explanations as to why hsp73 transport is altered in PrPSc producing cells: hsp73 may be trapped in a particular subcellular compartment; hsp73 may be bound to a protein (perhaps PrPSc ?); hsp73 may be altered structurally; or, as a final alterna tive, that translocation mechanisms may be altered. Whatever the reason, it does appear that the roles of PrP and the heat shock proteins could be intrinsically linked (Tatzelt et. al., 1995).


Studies on the prion encephalopathies using transgenic animals have suggested a possible role for heat shock proteins: transgenic mice expressing human PrPC are surprisingly insensitive to human prions injected into the brain (Telling et . al., 1995). Indeed, both onset and pathology of the disease appear to be similar to what is seen when human prions are injected directly into non-transgenic animals (Telling et. al., 1994). On crossing these transgenic mice with PrP-null mice (PrP 0/0), the crossed mice are very susceptible to human prions, indicating that mouse PrP inhibits the conversion of human PrPC to human PrPSc. Based on these findings and additional studies with transgenic mice expressing mutations known to cause natural prion diseases, the amino acid sequence of residues 96-167 in PrP appears to be vital for the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc (Telling et. al., 1995). If this region is homologous in endogenous PrP, or in the corresponding protein product of a PrP transgene, the disease progresses more rapidly. A second region in PrP, at the C-terminus between residues 215 and 230, has also been found to be important in the pro duction of PrPSc and may be the region where another species-specific macromolecule (presumably a protein) binds to PrPC (Telling et. al., 1995). This second protein, reflecting its hypothetical nature, has been designated 'pr otein X'. If the binding of host PrPC to host protein X was stronger than the binding of host PrPC to infecting PrPSc (because the latter originated in a different species), then the rate of d isease progression would be sl ow.


One final area of research which has yielded interesting results implicating heat shock proteins in the prion encephalopathies is the study of non-mendellian inherited elements (or extrachromosomally inherited determinants) in yeast (reviewed in Tuite, 1994). [PSI] is an element of S. cerevisiae which is known to amplify the efficiency of suppressor tRNAs, while [URE3] stops cells carrying out nitrogen catabolite repression - the suppression of genes utilised for exploiting poor nitrogen sources when a good source becomes available (Wickner, 1995). Several strong pieces of evidence suggest that [PSI] and [URE3] are `prion-like' forms of the `normal' proteins Sup35p and Ure2p, respectively: i) each element is reversibly curable, unlike nucleic acid replicons which cannot return once cured unless introduced from another cell; ii) [PSI] and [URE3] depend on chromosomal genes for their propagation, while phenotypes of recessive sup35 and ure2 closely resemble those produced in the presence of [PSI] and [URE3]; iii) overproduction of Ure2p and Sup35p induces the generation of [URE3] and [PSI] respectively; the presence of more of the `normal' form increases the chances of spontaneous `prion-type' change occurring (Masison and Wickner, 1995); iv) the N-terminus of Sup35p has several tandem nonapeptide repeats (similar to the octapeptide repeats seen in mammalian PrP); v) the predicted secondary structure of the N-terminal regions of Ure2p, Sup35p and mammalian PrPs all show related features, including very little alpha-helix or beta-sheets, and a high density of turns.

Hsp104 (a member of the hsp100 or Clp families of proteins (Wickner,S. et. al., 1994; Wawrzynow et. al., 1995) is highly conserved in both eukaryotes and prokaryotes, and has been shown to have a chaperone-like function in yeast (Parsell et. al., 1984). Loss of [PSI] occurs in relation to both over- or under-production of hsp104, suggesting both that it has a role in the conversion of the normal form of the protein (Sup35p) to the prion form [PSI] and also that, when too much hsp104 is present, this change in structure is reversed (Chernoff et. al., 1995). Concentrations of guanidine which can cure yeast strains of both [PSI] and [URE3] also induce the production of hsp104 , as can slight heat shock (Tuite et. al., 1981; Cox et. al., 1988). Thus, it seems that the controlled production of a heat shock protein i s effective in reducing the production of the prion isoforms of these proteins.


The production of mammalian PrPSc from PrPC in vitro is known to be very inefficient; a system in which the ratio of PrPC:PrPSc (both from the same species) was 1:50 yielded only trace amounts of PrPSc de novo (Kocisko et. al., 1994). Perhaps if a complete cell-free system could be set up (i.e. one which contained purified protein X or had a purified heat shock protein added to the system) an in vitro conversion that is as efficient as the conversion in the brains of infected animals could be created experimentally. Similarly, if PrPC to PrPSc conformation changes occur in the endocytic pathway, then in-vitro experiments with extracts of endosome-lysosomes may again increase the efficiency of the process.


References.

Arnold, J. E., Tipler, C., Laszlo, L., Hope, J., Landon, M. and Mayer, R. J. (1995). The abnormal isoform of the prion protein accumulates in late endosome-like organelles in scrapie-infected mouse-brain. J. Pathol. 176, 403-411.

Borchelt, D. R., Scott, M., Taraboulos, A., Stahl, N. and Prusiner, S. B. (1990). Scrapie and cellular prion proteins differ in their kinetics of synthesis and topology in cultured cells. J. Cell. Biol. 110, 743-752.

Borchelt, D. R., Taraboulos, A. and Prusiner, S. B. (1992). Evidence for synthesis of scrapie prion proteins in the endocytic pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 16188-16199.

Chernoff, Y. O., Lindquist, S. L., Ono, B., Ingevechtomov, S. G. and Liebman, S. W. (1995). Role of the chaperone protein hsp104 in propagation of the yeast prion-like factor [Psi(+)]. Science 268, 880-884.

Chiang, H.-L., Terlecky, S. R., Plant, C. P. and Dice, J. F. (1989). A role for a 70-kilodalton heat shock protein in lysosomal degradation of intracellular proteins. Science 246, 382-385.

Cohen, F. E., Pan, K.-M., Huang, Z., Baldwin, M., Fletterick, R. J. and Prusiner, S. B. (1994). Structural clues to prion replication. Science 264, 530-531.

Cox, B. S., Tuite, M. F. and McLaughlin, C. S. (1988). The PSI-factor of yeast - a problem in inheritance. Yeast 4, 159-178.

DeArmond, S. and Prusiner, S. B. (1995). Prion protein transgenes and the neuropathology in prion-diseases. Brain Pathol. 5, 77-89.

Dice, J. F. (1987). Molecular determinants of protein half-lives in eukaryotic cells. FASEB J. 1, 349-357.

Ironside, J. W., McCardle, L., Hayward, P. A. R. and Bell, J. E. (1993). Ubiquitin immunocytochemistry in human spongiform encephalopathies. Neuropathol. Appl Neurobiol. 19, 134-140.

Kenward, N., Hope, J., Landon, M. and Mayer, R. J. (1994). Expression of polyubiquitin and heat-shock protein-70 genes increases in the later stages of disease progression in scrapie-infected mouse-brain. J. Neurochem. 62, 1870-1877.

Kocisko, D. A., Come, J. H., Priola.S.A., Chesebro, B., Raymond, G. J., Lansbury, P. T. and Caughey, B. (1994). Cell-free formation of protease-resistant prion protein. Nature 370, 471-474.

Laszlo, L., Tuckwell, J., Self, T., Lowe, J., Landon, M., Smith, S., Hawthorne, J. N. and Mayer, R. J. (1991). The latent membrane protein-1 in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid-cells is found with ubiquitin-protein conjugates and heat-shock protein-70 in lysosomes oriented around the microtubule organizing center. J. Pathol. 164, 203-214.

Laszlo, L., Lowe, J., Self, T., Kenward, N., Landon, M., McBride, T., Farquhar, C., McConnell, I., Brown, J., Hope, J. and Mayer, R. J. (1992). Lysosomes as key organelles in the pathogenesis of prion encephalopathies. J. Pathol. 166, 333-341.

Liautard, J. P. (1991). Are prions misfolded molecular chaperones ? FEBS Lett. 294, 155-157.

Lowe, J., McDermott, H., Kenward, N., Landon, M., Mayer, R. J., Bruce, M., McBride, P., Somerville, R. A. and Hope, J. (1990). Ubiquitin immunoreactivity in the brains of scrapie-infected mice. J. Pathol. 161, A 360.

Lowe, J., Fergusson, J., Kenward, N., Laszlo, L., Landon, M., Farquhar, C., Brown, J., Hope, J. and Mayer, R. J. (1992). Immunoreactivity to ubiquitin-protein conjugates is present early in the disease process in the brains of scrapie-infected mice. J. Pathol. 168, 169-177.

Masison, D. C. and Wickner, R. B. (1995). Prion-inducing domain of yeast Ure2p and protease resistance of Ure2p prion-containing cells. Science 270, 93-95.

Pan, K.-M., Baldwin, M., Nguyen, J., Gasset, M., Serman, A., Groth, D., Mehlhorn, I., Huang, Z., Fletterick, R. J., Cohen, F. E. and Prusiner, S. B. (1993). Conversion of [[alpha]]-helices into [[beta]]-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90, 10962-10966.

Parsell, D. A., Kowal, A. S., Singer, M. A. and Lindquist, S. (1984). Protein disaggregation mediated by heat-shock protein hsp104. Nature 372, 475-478.

Prusiner, S. B., Hsiao, K. K., Bredesen, D. E. and DeArmond, S. J. (1989). Prion diseases. Handbook Clin. Neurol. 12, 543-580.

Prusiner, S. B. (1991). Molecular biology of prion diseases. Science 252, 1515-1522.

Prusiner, S. B. (1992). Chemistry and biology of prions. Biochemistry 31, 12278-12288.

Tatzelt, J., Zuo, J. R., Voellmy, R., Scott, M., Hartl, U., Prusiner, S. B. and Welch, W. J. (1995). Scrapie prions selectively modify the stress-response in neuroblastoma-cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 92, 2944-2948.

Telling, G. C., Scott, M., Hsiao.K.K., Foster, D., Yang, S.-L., Torchia, M., Sidle, K. C. L., Collinge, J., DeArmond, S. J. and Prusiner, S. B. (1994). Transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease from humans to transgenic mice expressing chimeric human-mouse prion protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91, 9936-9940.

Telling, G. C., Scott, M., Mastrianni, J., Gabizon, R., Torchia, M., Cohen, F. E., DeArmond, S. J. and Prusiner, S. B. (1995). Prion propagation in mice expressing human and chimeric PrP transgenes implicates the interaction of cellular PrP with another protein. Cell 83, 79-90.

Terlecky, S. R., Chiang, H.-L., Olson, T. S. and Dice, J. F. (1992). Protein and peptide binding and stimulation of in-vitro lysosomal proteolysis by the 70kDa heat shock cognate protein. J.Biol. Chem. 267, 9202-9209.

Terlecky, S. R. (1994). Hsp 70s and lysosomal proteolysis. Experientia 50, 1021-1025.

Tuite, M. F., Mundy, C. R. and Cox, B. S. (1981). Agents that cause a high frequency of genetic change from [PSI+] to [PSI-] in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 98, 691-711.

Tuite, M. (1994). Psi no more for yeast prions. Nature 370, 327-328.

Wawrzynow, A., Wojtkowiak, D., Marszalek, J., Banecki, B., Jonsen, M., Graves, B., Georgopoulos, C. and Zylicz, M. (1995). The ClpX heat shock protein of Escherichia coli, the ATP-dependent substrate specificity component of the ClpP-ClpX protease, is a novel molecular chaperone. EMBO J. 14, 1867-1877.

Wickner, R. B. (1994). [URE3] as an altered URE2 protein: evidence for a prion analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 264, 566-569.

Wickner, R. B. (1995). Prions of yeast and heat-shock-protein-104 - coprion and cure. Trends Microbiol. 3, 367-369.

Wickner, S., Gottesman, S., Skowyra, D., Hoskins, J., McKenney, K. and Maurizi, M. (1994). A molecular chaperone, ClpA, functions like DnaK and DnaJ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 91, 12218-12222.


Scrapie

Some notes on Scrapie

Chris Seidel     September 1995

     Scrapie is a member of a class of neurodegenerative diseases known as spongiform encephalopathies. Scrapie is referred to as a disease of protein conformation because it appears to be caused by the misfolding of a normal cellular protein, termed the prion protein, or PrP (Prusiner, 1982). While scrapie was originally identified in sheep and goats, the prion diseases span from chronic wasting disease in deer and elk, bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) of cattle, transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME), and several diseases in humans such as Kuru, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), Gerstmann- Straussler-Scheinker syndrome (GSS), and fatal familial insomnia (Gajdusek 1988). Common among these disorders is the three stage transition of PrP from normal cellular protein to the scrapie isoform and then to scrapie amyloid fibers which accumulate extracellularly in the brain (Gajdusek, 1988; Prusiner, 1992). The prion diseases have been something of an enigma due to their mysterious nature of transmission and propagation. Scrapie and Kuru are infectious and can be spread in a variety of ways, including cannibalism. There is also an associated incubation time between exposure and sickness that can range from months to decades.

     Because scrapie is infectious, early investigators were led to propose that scrapie was a viral agent with a slow course of infection (Cho, 1976; Kimberlin & Hunter, 1967). However the search for an associated nucleic acid has not been fruitful. The scrapie agent appears transparent to UV radiation at 254 nm and easily maintains infectivity at doses of UV far beyond those required to inactivate any virus tested (Alper et al.,1967). However, since different strains of Scrapie can be isolated, some investigators adhere to the notion of an associated independent genome for scrapie propagation (Bruce & Dickinson, 1987; Braig & Diringer, 1985).

     The scrapie agent was identified by enriching fractions from Syrian hamster brains for scrapie infectivity (Prusiner et al., 1982). The subsequent identification of a scrapie specific protein and generation of antibodies led to the identification of the prion protein in both infected and uninfected brains. This finding suggested for the first time that the scrapie agent is a single protein that exists as a different isoform in healthy versus uninfected tissue (Oesch et al., 1985). Subsequent studies have shown that the prion protein appears to be responsible for both the toxicity and infectivity of scrapie. The prion protein in its non-toxic isoform is referred to as PrPC, whereas the toxic and infective isoform is referred to as PrPSc. The two forms of PrP are easily distinguished based on their differential sensitivity to proteases, and solubility in detergents. PrP is normally observed as a 33-35 kDa protein in cellular extracts from either infected or healthy cells (Pfeifer et al., 1993). However PrPC is rapidly and completely degraded by digestion with proteinase K whereas PrPSc is stable to digestion with proteinase K, forming a 27-30 kDa protease resistant core termed PrP27-30. In addition, PrPC remains soluble in the presence of detergents, whereas PrP27-30 polymerizes into fibrils.

     The scrapie protein is encoded by a single copy cellular gene termed the prion protein gene (Oesch et al., 1985). The PrP gene is highly conserved across species, showing 88%-90% conservation at the genomic DNA level between sheep and other mammals such as human, rat, mouse, hamster and cow. The protein is encoded by a single exon, ruling out differential splicing as a cause of different protein conformers (Basler et al., 1986). The mRNA for PrP is expressed at similar levels in the brains and other tissues of both sick and healthy animals (Oesch et al., 1985). The normal cellular function of PrP is unknown. The protein is normally found as a membrane bound sialoglycoprotein (Stahl et al., 1987, Haraguchi et al., 1985) on the surface of neuroblastoma cells. Studies of mice in which the PrP gene has been removed (prn-P0/0) indicate that the gene is non-essential. Prn0/0 mice develop and behave normally with no visible or measurable defects (B½eler et al., 1992). Curiously, loss of the PrP gene renders these mice no longer susceptible to scrapie infection (B½eler et al., 1992). Furthermore, propagation of scrapie infectivity is also eliminated in mice missing the PrP gene (Prusiner, et al. 1993).

     In the past, studies of the scrapie reagent were greatly hindered by a bioassay requiring long incubation times on the order of months, or sometimes years, after injection of the agent into live animals, before a result could be seen (Prusiner 1992). With the development of chronically infected cell lines in which recombinant prion protein could be expressed and specifically identified (Butler et al., 1988), progress in studying scrapie has been greatly increased. Expression of prion protein in an infected cell line supports the conversion of endogenous PrPC as well as recombinant PrPC into PrPSc (Scott et al., 1992). While specific antibodies which can distinguish between the two isoforms have not been reported, the two forms are successfully distinguished based on their sensitivity to protease. Studies with cell lines have given insight into the cellular trafficking of the prion protein. However, the mechanism of conversion of prion protein into the scrapie isoform is not understood.

     Upon discovery that PrPC and PrPSc were encoded by the same gene a search began for some posttranslational modification that could give rise to the difference between the two proteins. However, examination of the two proteins for a covalent modification unique to one of the two isoforms has shown that both forms are modified identically. The prion protein undergoes several posttranslational modifications before either being degraded as PrPC or transforming into PrPSc and accumulating. A signal sequence present near the C-terminus targets prion protein synthesis to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where the sequence is cleaved leaving ser-231 as a site for attachment of a glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) group. Addition of the GPI moiety serves to anchor PrP to the surface of the cell. The GPI anchor is present on both PrPC and PrP27-30. However, synthesis of a truncated PrP lacking the GPI anchor attachment signal still results in the production of PrPSc, thus eliminating this component as a necessary factor for PrPSc production (Rogers et al., 1993).

     PrP protein also undergoes glycosylation in the Golgi. There are two consensus sites for asparagine linked glycosylation near the C-terminus of the prion protein. Examination of the various forms of the prion protein reveals that PrPC, PrPSc, and PrP27-30 are all glycosylated. While a myriad of different oligosaccharide structures are possible on the prion protein (Endo et al., 1989), it is doubtful that they play any role in leading to the transformation of PrPC into PrPSc. Use of a scrapie- infected cell line which can support PrPSc production has shown that synthesis of PrPSc in the presence of agents which block N-linked glycosylation still allows the production of protease resistant PrPSc, albeit PrPSc produced in this fashion is unglycosylated (Taraboulos et al., 1990). These results have been repeated by other methods, including site directed mutagenesis to eliminate the sites of N-linked glycosylation. PrPSc is still produced in the absence of sites for N-linked glycosylation. Thus it would appear that glycosylation is not an essential element in the transformation of PrPC into PrPSc. To begin examining how early in the trafficking pathway scrapie could be detected, and assess whether events during protein processing were responsible for misfolding of PrP, the ER-Golgi was examined. Brefeldin A is a reagent which causes the cis-medial and trans-Golgi cisternae to fuse with the ER and prevents exit of proteins from the ER-Golgi network (Doms et al., 1989). Treatment of scrapie-infected cells with Brefeldin A to retain PrP within the ER-Golgi apparatus was found to reversibly block synthesis of PrPSc. Thus it would appear that compartmentalization of PrP within the ER-Golgi is insufficient for PrPSc formation. Removal of BFA allows the synthesis of PrPSc to continue.

     Shortly after exit from the Golgi, PrPC appears on the cell surface held to the plasma membrane via the GPI anchor. Treatment of cells with phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C (PIPLC) cleaves the phosphatidyl linkage and releases protease sensitive PrPC into the medium. Interestingly this also inhibits production of PrPSc (Caughey & Raymond, 1991; Borchelt et al., 1990), suggesting that PrPSc is synthesized from PrPC after it travels to the plasma membrane. PrPC can be immunofluoresced on the surface of cells using an antibody that recognizes both PrPC and PrPSc. However upon treatment of cells with PIPLC, the immunofluorescence signal is lost (Borchelt et al., 1990). Although PrPSc is easily detected within cells (Taraboulos et al., 1990), it has not been detected on the surface of cells. Digestion of scrapie-infected cells with PIPLC does not release protease resistant PrP into the medium, yet the immunofluorescence signal is lost. Cell surface proteins can be labeled by a number of cell impermeant reagents (Goodloe- Holland & Luna ,1987). Exposure of scrapie-infected cells to sulfo-NHS-biotin allowed labeling of PrPC, but not PrPSc, although control experiments indicate that purified PrP27-30 is susceptible to sulfo-NHS- biotin labeling and maintains a protease resistant state afterwards (Borchelt et al., 1990). For these reasons it is thought that PrP enters the cell before conversion to PrPSc occurs.

     Evidence to date seems to indicate that the prion protein assumes the scrapie isoform in the endocytic pathway (Borchelt et al., 1992). However, direct identification of endosomes containing PrPSc has not been achieved. Immunofluorescence and immunocytochemical studies have been used to assay for the presence of PrP within cells. PrPSc is found to accumulate within cells, while PrPC is generally not observed except for very minor amounts in the ER-Golgi. From examination of the morphology of immunoperoxidase staining patterns, PrPSc was deduced to be associated with intracellular vesicles. No intracellular staining pattern was observed in healthy cells. These structures were found to be positive for acid phosphatase activity thus identifying them as secondary lysosomes. Kinetic studies show that the time between acquisition of protease resistance and exposure to lysosomal proteases is approximately one hour (Taraboulos et al., 1991). Use of lysosomotropic amines prevents the N-terminal trimming of PrPSc in the lysosome, yet does not block the formation of PrPSc, nor does it prevent the degradation of PrPC. Since PrPSc cannot be detected on the surface of cells, yet can be detected in lysosomes, and PrPC can not be detected in cells yet can be detected at the surface of cells, these observations taken together with those listed above point to the endosomal pathway as a possible place for the conversion of PrPC to PrPSc (Borchelt et al., 1992).

     In the absence of evidence for any significant covalent modifications that can distinguish PrPC from PrPSc, focus has shifted to the difference in secondary and tertiary structure between the two forms of the prion protein. Purification techniques for the scrapie protein have depended in large part on harsh conditions such as detergent extraction and proteinase K digestion. Purification of the prion proteins for structural studies would of course depend on more native conditions and structural studies have been hindered by the difficulty in purifying these two proteins. PrPC is soluble but difficult to purify in large amounts (Prusiner, 1991), and PrPSc is inherently insoluble and difficult to work with. Nonetheless spectroscopic data has been collected for both PrPC and PrPSc. Examination of PrPC and PrPSc by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy shows that the two differ significantly in the relative amounts of alpha helix and Beta sheet that each species contains. These findings have been verified by Circular Dichroism spectroscopy as well. PrPC contains approximately 42% alpha helix, and 3% beta sheet. However, PrPSc contains a high amount of Beta sheet, approximately 43% which rises to 54 % in PrP27-30 the product of proteolytic processing of PrPSc (Pan et al., 1993).

     The mechanism of prion propagation is not understood. Several theories exist as to how the prion protein comes to be misfolded and form aggregates. There is general agreement that PrPC and PrPSc differ primarily by conformation. One model holds that scrapie formation is a kinetic event dependent primarily on seeded nucleation, much like protein crystallization (Come et al., 1993, Jarret & Lansbury, 1993), or the polymerization of hemoglobin S into fibers as in sickle cell anemia (Hofrichter et al., 1974). PrPC is postulated to unfold slightly, exposing a hydrophobic stretch of amino acids to solvent. Aggregation then depends on the colocalization of the seed and the monomer. The partially unfolded state, PrPU, is proposed to be easily accessible from PrPC. Since PrPU formation is considered rapid, PrPU monomer is readily available for aggregation in the presence of a seed. Formation of the seed is the rate limiting step, and is considered to be slow, and dependent on the concentration of monomer molecules. In the case of infection, seed is introduced from outside, after which rapid aggregation can begin. Sporadic disorders, on the other hand, would depend on seed formation from PrPU monomers. The equilibrium between PrPC and PrPU could easily depend on the cellular environment, and be influenced by things such as pH, or the presence of interacting factors as well as mutations in the PrP gene that favor PrPU formation (Brown et al., 1991).

     Other investigators hold to the notion that the prion protein can exist in a meta stable state capable of collapse to either of two more permanent states. This model put forth by Prusiner and colleagues suggests that PrPC can assume a partially unfolded intermediate, PrP*, which can then become PrPSc, be degraded, or resume the PrPC form. In addition, PrPSc would be able to serve as a template for the conversion of PrP* into PrPSc. This model is not dependent on aggregates or seeds for scrapie formation. The slow step is considered to be formation of PrP*. Under normal conditions the concentration of PrP* is low and formation of PrPSc is not significant. However, at some threshold level, there would be enough PrPSc present to form a complex with any PrP* that forms, thus converting it to PrPSc and catalytically increasing the concentration of PrPSc. Infection with PrPSc would allow propagation by increasing the concentration of PrPSc beyond the threshold level. Sporadic disorders would arise through events which cause an increase in the frequency of PrP*, and subsequently PrPSc, such as a mutation in the PrP gene, interaction with a co-factor, or an optimal cellular environment.

     Initial attempts to reconstitute the misfolding of PrPC into a protease resistant form in vitro were not successful (Raeber et al., 1992). Since it is postulated that the misfolded form serves as a template or agent to direct misfolding of the normal isoform, it is reasonable to suspect that these are the only two components required for the creation of protease resistant PrPSc. Mixing purified preparations of the two forms did not result in detection of a newly formed protease resistant species (Raeber et al., 1992). Mixing experiments involving crude extracts, or synthesis of PrP in the presence of microsomal fractions failed to generate PrPSc as well. However, recently investigators were successful at generating a protease resistant species of prion protein in vitro by mixing PrPC and PrPSc together. Furthermore, these results have recently been extended to include in vitro formation of different strains of scrapie-like proteins starting from a common PrP precursor. Both of these reactions were dependent on the use of guanidinium to unfold the template PrPSc protein slightly, but not enough to diminish its infectivity. Because these results were obtained using highly purified components, they offer very strong support of the protein-only model for scrapie propagation. The amounts of new scrapie produced are much too small however to test for infectivity expected with the acquisition of protease resistance. These results also lend support to the notion that different strains of scrapie may differ simply by conformation of the prion protein. The time course required for in vitro formation of protease resistant PrP, the inefficiency of the reaction, and the nature of having to slightly unfold the template molecule, if not also PrPC, suggest there are conditions in the cell that are optimal for this process, and may even include a co-factor such as a chaperonin. The role of chaperonins in directing the folding of proteins is becoming well documented though is not yet well understood.

     Recently, a dimer of PrP was isolated from mouse neuroblastoma cells expressing hamster PrP (Priola et al., 1995). The dimer molecule appeared to be covalently linked or was stable to several strongly denaturing reagents including boiling in SDS. Interestingly, the dimer molecule showed properties of both PrPC and PrPSc in that it was protease sensitive, yet also tended to form aggregates. Initial examination of the cellular trafficking of the PrP dimer indicates that it contains only high mannose glycans, suggesting that it does not traverse the Golgi where conversion to more complex glycans usually occurs. Furthermore, no PrP dimer could be detected at the plasma membrane of the cells. Thus it does not appear to follow the same trafficking pattern as normal PrP. It is suggested that the dimer molecule may be an intermediate in scrapie formation (Priola et al., 1995). According to the seeded nucleation model described above, the propensity of the dimer to aggregate offers a means to the formation of an ordered nucleus which could act as a seed, or be acted upon by a seed of PrPSc(Priola et al., 1995). Scrapie-infected hamster brains were found to contain the dimer in a protease resistant form. Furthermore, in a cell free system the protease sensitive dimer is capable being converted to the protease resistant form in the presence of PrPSc purified from scrapie-infected hamster brains (Kocisko et al., 1994). The observation that the PrP dimer does not appear to traverse or enter the Golgi is based solely on the finding that the dimer is sensitive to treatment with endoglycosidase H to assay the type of glycans it contains. Endoglycosidase H is able to cleave most high mannose glycans but is not able to cleave complex oligosaccharides (Tarentino et al., 1978). As proteins traverse the Golgi they undergo oligosaccharide processing. PrP is normally observed to become resistant to endoglycosidase H as it traverses the Golgi where its high mannose glycans are converted to complex glycans. While most proteins undergo processing to more complex glycans, the diversity of structures and the extent of glycan processing of proteins is variable. In addition, the conformation of a protein may influence whether it undergoes complex glycan processing or remains high-mannose. Thus it is possible that the dimer enters the Golgi and gets sorted to some pathway without undergoing the same glycosylation as PrP monomers. Although dimers of PrP have been reported in the past, in light of these recent results they are conspicuously absent from the majority of the literature on scrapie. However given the large amounts observed by Priola et al., and the initial characterization of the properties of the dimer, many questions remain to be answered about the possible role of the PrP dimer in scrapie formation, and a system appears within reach to answer these questions.

     Recent results examining the affect of scrapie on the distribution and expression of various heat shock proteins (Hsps) in scrapie-infected cells revealed effects on several of the Hsps in comparison to healthy cells. While the majority of chaperones are constituitively expressed and found in abundance in cells under normal conditions (Gething & Sambrook, 1992), some of the heat shock proteins are highly induced under cell stress. In mouse neuroblastoma cells two of the most highly induced proteins in response to stress are hsp28 and hsp72 (Tatzelt et al., 1995). Exposure of cells to a brief heatshock or to stress inducing agents such as sodium arsenite, or Azc, an amino acid analog of proline, results in a marked increase in expression of several major mammalian stress proteins in both healthy and scrapie-infected mouse neuroblastoma cells. However, scrapie- infected cells depart from the normal stress response in that they fail to induce hsp28 and hsp72. The reasons for lack of induction of these two proteins in scrapie-infected cells are not understood. Another member of the hsp70 family highly related to hsp72 is hsp73. Hsp73 is constituitively expressed and is usually found in the cytoplasm. Exposure of cells to stress results in the translocation of both hsp72 and hsp73 into the nucleus of the cell. In scrapie-infected cells, hsp73 shows an abnormal punctate staining pattern in the cytoplasm, reminiscent of the staining pattern exhibited by scrapie accumulation in cells (Tatzelt et al., 1995). In contrast to normal neuroblastoma cells, scrapie-infected cells exposed to stress inducing conditions fail to translocate hsp73 into the nucleus. How scrapie is able to compromise the cellular stress response by affecting these proteins is not understood. Tatzelt and colleagues speculate that hsp73 may become trapped in a subcellular compartment or form a tight complex with PrPSc. The hsp70 proteins are described as undergoing a host of interactions with proteins, binding both folded and unfolded proteins. These interactions may be important in scrapie formation.

     Observations of prion-like behavior from other systems may be informative for how scrapie is functioning. In yeast, two proteins have been described as prions, as they appear to exhibit prion-like behavior of nongenetic self-propagation. Ure2p is a yeast protein involved in the regulation of nitrogen metabolism. Ure2p appears to spontaneously convert to an inactive form, Ure2p* (Weissmann, 1994), exhibiting a phenotype referred to as [URE3]. The Ure2p* works to convert active Ure2p into inactive Ure2p*. [URE3] is a dominant trait and can not be explained by classical genetic principles. No nucleic acid has been found to associate with it, but it can be passed between cells by transfer of cytoplasm. Another non-mendelian prion-like factor in yeast is [psi+]. Like [URE3], [psi+] is sensitive to agents which affect the yeast stress response. In a search for mutlticopy suppressors of [psi+] function, a chaperonin was found which is able to modulate the presence of the [psi+] phenotype in cells (Chernoff, 1995). Hsp104 was found to be required for propagation of [psi+], yet overexpression of Hsp104 "cures" the cells of [psi+]. It is postulated that Hsp104 may act by fostering or enabling an intermediate folding state, which is then able to collapse into either the prion or non prion state. Hsp104 is part of the Clp family of genes conserved from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, including genes involved in the stress response of mammalian cells (Parsell et al., 1991).

     From all indications cited above, scrapie formation appears to be localized to subcellular vesicles. Examination of vesicles could address the following three questions: Where is the precise location of scrapie formation? Does the PrP dimer that has been postulated to be an important intermediate in scrapie formation exist in the location of scrapie formation? Does hsp73 co- localize or share any compartment with PrPC or PrPSc?


References

Alper, T., Cramp, W. A., Haig, D. A., and Clarke, M. C. (1967). Does the Agent of Scrapie Replicate without Nucleic Acid? Nature 214, 764-766.

Ananthan, J., Goldberg, A. R., and Voellmy, R. (1986). Abnormal proteins serve as eukaryotic stress signals and trigger the activation of heatshock genes. Science 232, 252-58.

Basler, K., Oesch, B., Scott, M., Westaway, D., WE4lchli, M., Groth, D. F., McKinley, M. P., Prusiner, S. B., and Weismann, C. (1986) Scrapie and Cellular PrP Isoforms Are Encoded by the Same Chromosomal Gene. Cell 46, 417-428.

Borchelt, D. R., Scott, M. Taraboulos A., Stahl, N., and Prusiner, S. B. (1990). Scrapie and Cellular Prion Proteins Differ in Their Kinetics of Synthesis and Topology in Cultured Cells. J. Cell Biol. 110, 743-752.

Borchelt, D. R., Taraboulos, A., and Prusiner, S. A. (1992). Evidence for Synthesis of Scrapie Prion Proteins in the Endocytic Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 267(23), 16188-16199.

Braig, H. R., and Diringer, H. (1985). Scrapie: concept of a virus-induced amyloidosis of the brain. EMBO J. 4(9), 2309-2312.

Brown, C. R., Martin, R. L., Hansen, W. J., Beckmann, R. P., and Welch, W. J. (1993). The Constitutive and Stress Inducible Forms of hsp70 Exhibit Functional Similarities and Interact with One Another in an ATP-dependent Fashion. J. Cell Biol. 120(5), 1101-12.

Bruce, M. E., and Dickinson, A. G. (1987) Biological Evidence that Scrapie has an Independent Genome. J. gen. Virol. 68, 79-89.

Bueler, H., Aguzzi, A., Sailer, A., Greiner, R.-A., Autenried, P., et al. (1993). Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie. Cell 73, 1339-47.

Bueler, H., Fischer, M., Lang, Y., Bluthmann, H., Lipp, H.-L., et al. (1992). The neuronal cell surface protein PrP is not essential for normal development and behavior of the mouse. Nature 356, 577-582.

Butler D. A., Michael, R. D., Bockman, J. M., Borchelt, Taraboulos, A., Hsiao, K. K., Kingsbury, D. T., and Prusiner, S. B. (1988). Scrapie-Infected Murine Neuroblastoma Cells Produce Protease-Resistant Prion Proteins. J. Virol. 62(5), 1558-1564.

Caughey, B., Neary, K., Buller, R., Ernst, D., Perry, L. L., Chesebro, B., Race, R. E. (1990). Normal and Scrapie-Associated Forms of Prion Protein Differ in Their Sensitivities to Phospholipase and Proteases in Intact Neuroblastoma Cells. J. Virol. 64(3), 1093-1101.

Caughey, B., and Raymond, G. J. (1991). The scrapie-associated form of PrP is made from a cell surface precursor that is both protease and phospholipase sensitive. J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18217-18223.

Chavrier, P., Parton, R. G., Hauri, H. P., Simons K., and Zerial, M. (1990). Localization of Low Molecular Weight GTP Binding Proteins to Exocytic and Endocytic Compartments. Cell 62, 317-329.

Cheng, M. Y., Hartl, F.-U., and Horwich, A. L. (1990). The mitochondrial chaperonin hsp60 is required for its own assembly. Nature 348, 455-58.

Chernoff, Y. O., Lindquist, S. L., Ono, B.-i. Inge-Vechtomov, S. G., and Liebman, S. W. (1995). Role of the Chaperone Protein Hsp104 in Propagation of the Yeast Prion-Like Factor [psi+]. Science 268, 880-884.

Cho, H. J. (1976) Is the scrapie agent a virus? Nature 262, 412-413.

Clarke, C. F., Cheng, K., Frey, A. B., Stein, R., Hinds, P. W., Levine, A. J. (1988). Purification of complexes of nuclear oncogene p53 with rat and Escherichia coli heat shock proteins: in vitro dissociation of hsc70 and dnaK from murine p53 by ATP. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8(3), 1206-15.

Come, J. H., Fraser, P. E., and Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (1993). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 5959-5963.

DeArmond, S. J., McKinley, M. P., Barry, R. A., Braunfeld, M. B., McColloch, J. R., and Prusiner, S. B. (1985). Identification of Prion Amyloid Filaments in Scrapie-Infected Brain. Cell 41, 221-235.

Doms, R. W., Russ, G., Yewdell, J. W. (1989). Brefeldin A redistributes resident and itinerant Golgi proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 109(1), 61-72.

Endo, T., Groth, D., Prusiner, S. B., and Kobata, A. (1989). Diversity of Oligosaccharide Structures Linked to Asparagines of the Scrapie Prion Protein. Biochemistry 28, 8380-8388.

Gajdusek, D. C. (1988). Mt. Sinai J. Med. 55, 3-5.

Goodloe-Holland, C. M., and Luna, E. J. (1987). Purification and Characterization of Dictyostelium discoideum Plasma Membranes. Methods in Cell Biology, ed Spudich, J. A. (Academic, New York), Vol. 28, pp.103-128.

Griffiths, G., Hoflack, B., Simons, K., Mellman, I., and Kornfeld, S. (1988). The Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor and the Biogenesis of Lysosomes. Cell 52, 329-341

Hadlow, W. J., Race, R. E., Kennedy, R. C., and Eklund, C. M. (1979). Natural infection of sheep with scrapie virus. In Slow Transmissible Diseases of the Nervous System, 2, S. B. Prusiner and W. J. Hadlow, eds. (New York: Academic Press), pp. 3-12.

Hamos, J. E., Oblas, B., Pulaski-Salo, D., Welch, W. J., Bole, D. G., and Drachman, D. A. (1991). Expression of heat shock proteins in Alzheiner's disease. Neurology 41(3), 345-50.

Hopkins, C. R., and Trowbridge, I. S. (1983). Internalization and processing of transferrin and the transferrin receptor in human carcinoma A431 cells. J. Cell Biol. 97, 508-21.

Jarrett, J. T., and Lansbury, P. T., Jr. (1993) Cell 73, 1055-1058.

Kimberlin, R. H., and Hunter, G. D. (1967). J. Gen. Virol. 1, 115.

Kocisko, D. A., Come, J. H., Priola, S. A., Chesebro, B., Raymond, G. J., Lansbury, P. T., and Caughey, B. (1994). Cell-free formation of protease- resistant prion protein. Nature 370, 471-474.

McKinley, M. P., Taraboulos, A., Kenaga, L., Serban, D., Steiber, A., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B., and Gonatas, N. (1991). Ultrastructural Localization of Scrapie Prion Proteins in Cytoplasmic Vesicles of Infected Cultured Cells. Lab. Invest. 65(6), 622-30.

Meyer, R. K., McKinley, M. P., Bowman, K. A., Braunfeld, M. B., Barry, R. A., and Prusiner, S. B. (1986). Separation and properties of cellular and scrapie prion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83, 2310-2314.

Milner, J., and Medcalf, E. A. (1991). Cotranslation of Activated Mutant p53 with Wild Type Drives the Wild-Type p53 Protein into the Mutant Conformation. Cell 65, 765-74.

Mu, F-.T., Callaghan, J. M., Steele-Mortimer, Stenmark, H., Parton, R. G., Campbell, P. L., McCluskey, J., Yeo, J-.P., Tock, E. P. C., and Toh, B-.H. (1995). EEA1, an Early Endosome- Associated Protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270(22), 13503-13511.

Oesch, B., Westaway, D., Walchli, M., McKinley, M. P., Kent, S. B. H., Aebersold, R., Barry, R. A., Tempst, P., Teplow, D. B., Hood, L. E., Prusiner, S. B., and Weissmann, C. (1985). A Cellular Gene Encodes Scrapie PrP 27-30 Protein. Cell 40, 735-746.

Pan, K.-M., Baldwin, M., Nguyen, J., Gasset, M., Serban, A., Groth, D., Melhorn, I., Huang, Z., Fletterick, R. J., Cohen, F. E., and Prusiner, S. B. (1993). Conversion of a-helices into b-sheets features in the formation of the scrapie prion proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10962- 10966.

Papini, E., de Bernard, M., Milia, E., Bugnoli, M., Zerial, M., Rappuoli, R., Montecucco, C. (1994). Cellular vacuoles induced by Helicobacter pylori originate from late endosomal compartments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91(21), 9720-9724.

Parsell, D. A., Sanchez, Y., Stitzel, J. D., Lindquist, S. (1991). Hsp104 as a highly conserved protein with two essential nucleotide-binding sites. Nature 353, 270-273.

Perez, N., Sugar, J., Charya, S., Johnson, G., Merril, C., Bierer, L., Perl, D., Haroutunian, V., and Wallace, W. (1991). Increased synthesis and accumulation of heat shock 70 proteins in Alzheimer's disease. Brain Research. Mol. Brain Res. 11(3-4), 249-54.

Pfeifer, K., Bachmann, M., Schroder, H. C., Forrest, J., and MFCller, W. E. G. (1993). Kinetics of Expression of Prion Protein in Uninfected and Scrapie-infected N2a Mouse Neuroblastoma Cells. Cell. Biochem. Func. 11, 1-11.

Priola, S. A., Caughey, B., Wehrly, K., and Chesebro, B. (1995). A 60-kDa Prion Protein (PrP) with properties of Both the Normal and Scrapie-associated Forms of PrP. J. Biol. Chem. 270(7), 3299- 3305.

Prusiner, S. B., Groth, D., Serban, A., Koehler, R., Foster, D., et al. (1993). Ablation of the prion protein (PrP) gene in mice prevents scrapie and facilitates production of anti-PrP antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 10608-12.

Prusiner, S. B. (1992). Chemistry and Biology of Prions. Biochemistry 31(49), 12277-87.

Prusiner, S. B. (1991). Novel Properties and Biology of Scrapie Prions. Curr. Topics Microbiol. Immun. 172, 233-257

Prusiner, S. B., Bolton, D. C., Groth, D. F., Bowman, K. A., Cochran, S. P., and McKinley, M. P. (1982). Further Purification and Characterization of Scrapie Prions. Biochemistry 21(26), 6942- 50.

Prusiner, S. B. (1982). Novel Proteinaceous Infectious Particles Cause Scrapie. Science 216,136-144.

Raeber, A. J., Borchelt, D. R., Scott, M., and Prusiner, S. B. (1992). Attempts To Convert the Cellular Prion Protein into the Scrapie Isoform in Cell-Free Systems. J. Virol. 66(10), 6155-6163.

Rexach, M. F., Latterich, M., and Schekman, R. W. (1994). Characteristics of Endoplasmic Reticulum- derived Transport Vesicles. J. Cell Biol. 126(5), 1133-1148.

Rogers, M., Yehiely, F., Scott, M., and Prusiner, S. B. (1993). Conversion of truncated and elongated prion proteins into the scrapie isoform in cultured cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 3182-86.

Sandoval I. V., and Bakke O. (1994). Targeting of membrane proteins to endosomes and lysosomes. Trends Cell Bio. 4, 292-297.

Schmid, S. L., Fuchs, R., Male, P., and Mellman, I. (1988). Two Distinct Subpopulations of Endosomes Involved in Membrane Recycling and Transport to Lysosomes. Cell 52, 73-83.

Scott, M. R., Kohler, R., Foster, D., and Prusiner, S. B. (1992). Chimeric prion protein expression in cultured cells and transgenic mice. Prot. Sci. 1, 986-997.

Shyng, S-.L., Huber, M. T., and Harris, D. A. (1993). A Prion Protein Cycles between the Cell Surface and an Endocytic Compartment in Cultured Neuroblastoma Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 268(21), 15922-15928.

Shyng, S.-L., Heuser, J. E., and Harris, D. A. (1994). A Glycolipid-anchored Prion Protein Is Endocytosed via Clathrin-coated Pits. J. Cell Biol. 125(6), 1239-1250.

Stahl, N., and Prusiner, S. B. (1991). Prions and prion proteins. FASEB J. 5, 2799-2807.

Stahl, N., Borchelt, D. R., Hsiao, K., and Prusiner, S. B. (1987). Scrapie Prion Protein Contains a Phosphatidylinositol Glycolipid. Cell 51, 229-240.

Taraboulos, A., Raeber, A., Borchelt, D., McKinley, M. P., and Prusiner, S. B. (1991). FASEB J. 5, A1177.

Taraboulos, A., Rogers, M., Borchelt, D. R., McKinley, M. P., Scott, M., Serban, D., and Prusiner, S. B. (1990) Acquisition of protease resistance by prion proteins in scrapie-infected cells does not require asparagine-linked glycosylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87, 8262-66.

Taraboulos, A., Serban, D., and Prusiner, S. B. (1990). Scrapie Prion Proteins Accumulate in the Cytoplasm of Persistently Infected Cultured Cells. J. Cell Biol. 110, 2117- 32.

Tatzelt, J., Zuo, J., Voellmy, R., Scott, M., Hartl, U., Prusiner, S. B., Welch, W. J. (1995). Scrapie prions selectively modify the stress response in neuroblastoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92(7), 2944-8.

Tokuko H., Fisher, S., Olofsson, S., Endo, T., Groth, D., Tarentino, A., Borchelt, D. R., Teplow, D., Hood, L., Burlingame, A., Lycke, E., Kobata, A., and Prusiner, S. B. (1989). Asparagine-Linked Glycosylation of the Scrapie and Cellular Prion Proteins. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 274(1), 1-13.

Weissmann, C. (1994). The Prion Connection: Now in Yeast? Science 264, 528-30.

This reference list includes references that are part of a section on proposed experiments, that has not been included in the Notes on Scrapie link.