Armed police block British corned beef sales in Kenya
Germans stand firm on beef ban
Dutch calves held at British port
Brittan attacked for BSE 'distortion'
Brussels sees no prospect of beef ban being lifted
Beef crisis may lead to EU farm policy reform
Britain wins reprieve on cattle cull
Brussels to study forecast that BSE will disappear
Cattle cull put on hold as EU talks continue
Brussel snub to Hogg over cull
Britain set to back out of deal on cattle cull
Ministers set to call off cattle cull tomorrow
Prince gives warning on intensive farming
Rapid rise in number of cancer sufferers


Armed police block British corned beef sales in Kenya

THE TIMES: FOREIGN NEWS September 21 1996
FROM SAM KILEY IN NAIROBI

ALARM over "mad cow" disease spread to Africa yesterday as the Kenyan Government impounded tonnes of corned beef believed to have come from Britain and posted armed police at supermarkets selling it. A consignment of 3.2 tonnes of beef was seized by Mombasa port health authorities, who suspected the tinned meat might have been infected with BSE. The Government then revoked the trading licence for Nakumatt supermarkets, Kenya's second largest chain, forcing it to close outlets, and ordered police with automatic rifles to keep shoppers away from supermarkets in Mombasa, Nairobi and Eldoret.

A statement from the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said that the corned beef had been brought to Kenya with out clearance from the "revelant authorities". The beef was originally thought to have come from Brazil, but Kenya later established that the meat was British. Nakumatt Holdings, owners of the supermarket chain, placed newspaper advertisements defending itself against accusations that it was importing suspect beef. It claimed that meat had been "manufactured" in Brazil for John West Foods of England and had been packed under "Brazilian government inspection".

No tests have yet been carried out, but the Kenyans have demanded that the beef be shipped back to Britain to "prevent the spread of a potentially fatal disease to animals and humans". Cheap processed meat, much of it from the European Union's mountains of unsold agricultural produce, has been marketed in Africa for many years, but few locals find it satisfactory.

Kenya's domestically produced beef, which is reared free-range on wild shrubs, would be the delight of many British consumers because it is cheap (top-quality fillet costs about £2.50 per kg) and produced without chemicals, supplementary blood meal feed or artificial hormones.

Vegetables from Kenya's highland farms fill the shelves of British supermarkets, and Kenya is the world's largest exporter of cut flowers. But government officials and farmers have been prevented from penetrating the European meat market by tariff barriers and the lack of abattoirs that meet EU standards.


Brussels sees no prospect of beef ban being lifted

BY ANDREW PIERCE AND CHARLES BREMNER
The Times: Britain: September 21 1996

THE European Union's ban on the export of British beef will not be lifted for the foreseeable future, the EU Agriculture Commissioner, said yesterday. "As long as they do not meet the preconditions, then an end to the export ban is simply not a possibility," Franz Fischler said. His statement reflected the scorn and indifference in Europe that has greeted the British decision to opt for a lesser cull than that agreed at the Florence summit in June.

The European Commission gave warning that British hopes of winning an early exemption from the ban for certain herds in Northern Ireland and elsewhere would come to nothing until the original selective slaughter was started. John Major appealed in vain yesterday for an end to the "hysteria" in Europe surrounding BSE and a return to rational debate over the lifting of the export ban. Douglas Hogg, the Agriculture Minister, admitted that the prospect of a Tory revolt had been a decisive factor in the decision to suspend the cull.

Germany, which has taken the toughest line against Britain throughout the BSE crisis, led a wave of condemnation for what officials depicted as the Cabinet's "incomprehensible" decision to renege on the Florence undertaking. "A unilateral change by the British Government is not acceptable," Klaus Kinkel, the German Foreign Minister, said. "The main priority is the health of the consumer."

Ireland, which, as current EU President speaks for the Council of Farm Ministers, noted that British behaviour would have no impact on Europe since the beef ban would simply stay in place. Ivan Yates, Irish Agriculture Minister, said that the British move was "a matter of indifference" to many member states: "The move will considerably widen the gulf of understanding about tackling the BSE problem."

The Commission tried to keep doors open, noting that EU scientists were still reviewing the latest British data and could recommend a rise or reduction in the slaughter, which was set at 147,000 cattle. Sir Leon Brittan, the senior British Commissioner, persuaded his colleagues to have the latest science reviewed before dismissing Mr Major's latest approach.

The Commission remained open to discussing the possibility of easing the ban for animals from certified herds, possibly on a regional basis, "but only if the terms of the Florence agreement are respected," said Gerry Kiely, spokesman for Herr Fischler. The latest conflict over Britain's handling of its BSE crisis has further soured the atmosphere ahead of an EU summit in Dublin on October 5.





Beef crisis may lead to EU farm policy reform

By Caroline Southey in Brussels

Financial Times ... Thursday September 19 1996

The European Union risks breaching internationally agreed beef export limits because of falling European demand sparked six months ago by fears over BSE, or mad cow disease.

The position could sharply increase pressure for radical reform of the Common Agricultural Policy aimed at curbing beef production. The warning is spelt out by the Irish presidency in a paper prepared for EU farm ministers who are to meet early next week at Killarney, Ireland.

The presidency warns that over-shooting the limits set under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade can only be avoided if farm policy is overhauled to curb beef production dramatically.

The EU is expected to produce 720,000 tonnes of surplus beef this year following an 11 per cent fall in consumption because of fears over BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy).

The EU's ability to contain over-production could be further undermined if Britain decides today to abandon a pledge for a wholesale cull of 125,000 cattle as part of its anti-BSE strategy. The current British cull of animals over 30 months of age combined with the contested selective cull was expected to reduce EU beef production by 3 per cent a year.

The European Commission yesterday agreed to study in detail a recent report from Oxford scientists which predicted that mad cow disease would die out by 2001.

The Irish presidency predicts that the EU faces the prospect of being unable to sell its surplus beef stocks because the EU beef market is unlikely to be restored to pre-BSE levels in the foreseeable future while export opportunities are constrained by the Gatt, the forum for world trade negotiations before the setting up of the World Trade Organisation. It limits EU exports of beef to 1.7m tonnes in 1996-97.

"The EU looked set to cope with Gatt restrictions without significant adjustments to policy. However, this view has to be substantially revised in the light of developments following the BSE crisis," according to the Irish paper.

Commission officials warned that the extent of the reform would be driven by the fate of proposals to cut production immediately. EU farm ministers this week backed plans set out by Mr Franz Fischler, European commissioner for agriculture, to curb the beef supply by slaughtering EU calves and taking more surplus stocks off the market. But the majority rejected Mr Fischler's proposal that the measures had to be paid for by cutting aid to arable farmers.


Britain wins reprieve on cattle cull

By Toby Helm in Brussels, George Jones and David Brown

Daily Telegraph ... Thursday 19 September 1996

THE Government won a temporary reprieve last night for up to 147,000 cattle due to be slaughtered in the battle against BSE after the European Commission agreed to re-examine evidence suggesting the cull was unnecessary. The change of heart came a day after Douglas Hogg had returned empty-handed from Brussels ready to tell today's Cabinet committee meeting that Britain should go it alone and call off the cull.

Franz Fischler, the European Union's Agriculture Commissioner, told yesterday's commission meeting in Strasbourg that the study, which set out a range of options for eradicating BSE, was a "serious" and "constructive" document.

Twenty-four hours earlier he had lined up with 14 farm ministers from across Europe to tell Mr Hogg, the Agriculture Minister, that it made no difference to the terms of the selective slaughter programme agreed with John Major at the Florence summit in June.

The decision to review the new evidence contained in an Oxford University study published last month was taken after strong pressure from Sir Leon Brittan, the senior British commissioner in Brussels. Last night both Downing Street and the Agriculture Ministry welcomed the announcement. But ministers cautioned against talk of a "breakthrough".

They said it was still likely that the "beef Cabinet" would decide that the cull should be scaled back drastically. However, the move by Brussels suggests that a compromise might yet be possible. Earlier in the day, both Mr Major and Mr Hogg had made clear that there was no prospect of Parliament agreeing to the slaughter programme unless there were clear assurances of a quick and substantial lifting of the worldwide ban on British beef.

One option before Cabinet ministers today will be a limited cull of about 22,000 calves at high risk of contracting BSE from diseased cows. This would be intended to meet new concerns about the risk of maternal transmission of BSE from mother to calf.

The Government also wants Europe to lift the ban on exports from specialist beef herds, mainly in Scotland and Northern Ireland, which are certified BSE-free.

'This positive approach by the commission should discourage those tempted in the UK to push for the unilateral repudiation of the Florence agreement'

On Tuesday, Mr Hogg's call for a review of the cull was flatly rejected by Mr Fischler. Commission sources said last night that Sir Leon had taken up Mr Hogg's case and had argued that the Oxford study - which concluded that BSE would die out naturally by 2001 - merited more serious and lengthy consideration by European scientists. The study said the selective cull was an inefficient way to try to eliminate BSE and would mean the destruction of unnecessarily large numbers of healthy cattle.

Sir Leon won the backing of Jacques Santer, the commission president, and Mr Fischler. It was agreed to refer the study back to the EU's new multi-disciplinary committee of scientists and vets who are working on the BSE issue.

Sir Leon warned the meeting that dismissing the study out of hand could trigger another damaging dispute with Mr Major's government at a time when members of the European Union needed to work together.

After the meeting, Sir Leon said: "The commission is not unsympathetic to Britain's predicament. It considers the Oxford study a constructive and serious piece of work and is anxious to pass it to the scientific experts. The Commission is open-minded on the implications for the extended cull."

Sir Leon made a specific plea to those demanding that the Prime Minister goes back on the deal agreed in Florence. "This positive approach by the commission should discourage those tempted in the UK to push for the unilateral repudiation of the Florence agreement," he said.

Although the Commission's decision represents progress for the Government it by no means guarantees that EU member states will agree to a reduction, or the abandonment of the cull. So far member states - urged on by Germany and Austria - have insisted that the deal to slaughter up to 147,000 cattle struck at Florence cannot be tampered with and that they will not consider easing the worldwide ban until the selective cull is carried out in full. But pressure from the commission will be influential.

Senior sources in Brussels said that it was "certainly possible" that the details of how the cull was to be carried could be altered "so long as there was not an overall scaling down of the action to be taken".

The commission, although much criticised by Euro-sceptics for imposing the ban on British beef exports in March, has been an unlikely ally of the Government. It pushed hard for the ban to be lifted on beef derivatives.


Brussels to study forecast that BSE will disappear

by Philip Webster, Political Editor

The Times ... September 19 1996

THE European Commission announced last night that it was taking a second look at the Oxford study which found that "mad cow" disease would disappear naturally within five years.

The decision, welcomed by Downing Street and Agriculture Ministry officials, means that the Government could be persuaded today to draw back from a new confrontation with Brussels over beef. Ministers had planned to announce today that they were abandoning the proposed slaughter of 147,000 cows thought most at risk from BSE. The Government had concluded that the cull, agreed after fears that the human brain disease CJD could be linked to BSE, had no chance of being endorsed by MPs.

Last night's conciliatory move from the Commission is likely to mean a "pause for thought", officials said. Michael Forsyth, the Scottish Secretary, will argue at today's Cabinet committee meeting for a special effort to lift the ban on the export of Scottish beef. Farmers in Scotland feel that they were being unfairly treated because many of their herds had no history of BSE.

Informed sources said that the Prime Minister and Douglas Hogg, the Agriculture Minister, now accepted that it would be impossible to get the planned cattle cull through the Commons. Today they will welcome the fact that the Commission is looking again at the scientific evidence.

The Commission's change of heart was designed to avoid a confrontational announcement in London today. Franz Fischler, the Commissioner for Agriculture, said that the Oxford study, which sets out a range of options for eradicating BSE, was a serious and constructive document.

Twenty-four hours earlier he had told Mr Hogg that it made no difference to the terms of the selective slaughter programme agreed with Mr Major at the European summit in Florence in June. Sir Leon Brittan had urged his fellow commissioners to look more closely at the details. The British commissioner said last night: "The Commission is not unsympathetic to Britain's predicament. It considers the Oxford study a constructive and serious piece of work and is anxious to pass it to the experts. The Commission is open-minded on the implications for the extended cull."

Cattle cull put on hold as EU talks continue

BY ARTHUR LEATHLEY
The Times: Britain: September 20 1996

THE proposed slaughter of 147,000 cattle was put on hold last night as ministers increased pressure on the European Commission to agree a partial lifting of the ban on British beef exports. Downing Street announced that the selective cull agreed with the Commission will not take place while discussions continue about scientific evidence and the export of beef from BSE-free herds.

Douglas Hogg, the Agriculture Minister, was expected to put proposals last night to Franz Fischler, the European Commissioner for Agriculture, on lifting the export ban on beef from herds certified as BSE-free, most of which are in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

Ministers are aware that, with Tory opposition to a full cull running high, the Commons will not approve proposals for the slaughter of 147,000 cattle. However, Whitehall sources suggest that a scaled-down cull might be approved if there are signs of a partial lifting of the export ban.

Roger Freeman, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and the chairman of the Cabinet committee examining the crisis, said: "It's welcome news that the Commission is going to look at the scientific evidence on when BSE is likely to be eradicated." He told BBC Radio 4's Today: "We agreed in Florence to take certain steps in the UK which in some part we have already met, such as the improvement of slaughter home practices. We are fulfilling our side of the bargain and in return we wanted an early lifting of the ban in stages, perhaps beginning with the export from herds that can be certified as always having been BSE-free."

Tory backbencher Paul Marland, MP for rural Gloucestershire West, and who has been a vocal critic of the mass cull, said: "I am very pleased to hear this decision. It will go down very well in Gloucester market and elsewhere. It [the selective cull] was an horrific prospect."

The Meat and Livestock Commission gave the news a guarded welcome. "It is potentially good news for farmers, providing there is political goodwill on all sides," a spokesman said. "There are two things that need to be done. One is to restore consumer confidence in beef and the other is to restore exports of British beef as soon as possible." Ministers also announced £60 million in aid for farmers in hill and upland areas, mainly in Scotland, who have been hit particularly hard during the past six months.



Brussel snub to Hogg over cull

By David Brown and George Jones

Daily Telegraph ... Wednesday 18 September 1996

Douglas Hogg, the Agriculture Minister, will tomorrow recommend to the Cabinet that Britain should abandon the culling of up to 147,000 cattle after returning empty-handed from talks in Brussels.

Ministers are expected to shelve the slaughter scheme despite threats that Europe could withhold compensation payments for British farmers for action already taken to eradicate BSE. Mr Hogg left Brussels soon after other European farm ministers and Franz Fischler, the EU Farm Commissioner, refused to scale down the proposed selective cull of thousands of cattle believed to be at the highest risk of developing BSE.

He said the Government would want to "consider the importance of these developments", which was taken as a clear hint that Britain will go it alone.

Officials said that nothing had happened in Brussels to persuade Mr Hogg to change his advice last week to the "beef Cabinet" headed by John Major that new scientific advice that BSE would fade out by 2001 made the selective slaughter unnecessary.

Government sources also played down a threat by Karol Pinxten, Belgium's Minister of Agriculture, that EU cash compensation payments worth more than £260 million for the existing programme to destroy cattle over 30 months old might be withheld.

Mr Pinxten said Europe expected the Government to honour its agreement. Without the cull, Mr Major could not expect any easing of the worldwide ban on British beef exports. British officials said the threat of withholding compensation had not been mentioned during the talks in Brussels and was no more than "noises off".

They also pointed out that Brussels would eventually foot the bill for only 20 per cent of the compensation. Mr Fischler also played down the threat of financial retaliation as hypothetical and not worth dwelling on.

But ministers will be warned tomorrow that there is a serious risk that the EU will keep the worldwide ban on British beef until BSE is eradicated. But Mr Hogg sees little prospect of the ban being lifted even if the cull went ahead. Many countries outside Europe, including the United States, have already banned British beef.

Britain's worsening relations with Europe over BSE were highlighted when Mr Hogg pulled out of a social engagement on a farm outside Brussels designed to celebrate the importance of women in European agriculture.

Earlier fellow EU farm ministers listened in silence as he proposed reconsidering the scale of the selective cull envisaged at Florence. He cited the recent Oxford University report which showed that BSE would be wiped out in the UK by 2001 even without any selective cull.

They took the view that the findings were neither new nor significant enough to warrant a rethink. Franz-Josef Feiter, Germany's Deputy Minister of Agriculture, told reporters that as far as he was concerned the British beef export ban should remain in force as long as there was a threat of BSE in Britain. Mr Hogg said later he was "disturbed" by these comments.

Earlier in the day British farm leaders appealed to Mr Hogg at a private meeting to do nothing to jeopardise the lifting of the beef ban and escalate the BSE crisis.


Britain set to back out of deal on cattle cull

By Alison Maitland in London and Caroline Southey in Brussels

Financial Times ... Wednesday September 18 1996

The British government is set to tear up its agreement with the European Union to slaughter 125,000 cattle after EU farm ministers yesterday rebuffed the UK's call for a reduction in the cull.

But Britain may press ahead with its own limited cull of about 22,000 cattle at high risk of contracting BSE from their diseased mothers in a move to bolster domestic consumer confidence in beef.

Mr Franz Fischler, European Commissioner for agriculture, yesterday expressed "extreme concern" at possible unilateral action by the UK to reduce the cull.

But EU officials rejected suggestions by Mr Karel Pinxton, the Belgian farm minister, that the EU might retaliate by cutting off EU funds earmarked to help Britain cope with the mad cow crisis.

"Relations would have to sour very badly for such a step to be taken," one EU official said.

The agreement for the UK to cull 125,000 cows was struck by EU partners in Florence in June in return for a phased lifting of the worldwide export ban on British beef. Mr Douglas Hogg, the British agriculture minister, yesterday called on the farm ministers to consider a reduced cull, in the light of evidence that BSE would die out by the year 2001 without the cull, and because of steps Britain has already taken to reduce the threat of the disease.

Mr Fischler made clear afterwards that there could be no change to the agreement, saying that the slaughter programme was a condition that had to be fulfilled before any consideration could be given to lifting the export ban.

A UK official said Mr Hogg would report to the cabinet committee dealing with BSE tomorrow. The chances were very high that the full cull agreed with EU partners in Florence in June would be abandoned, he said.

The government's view is that the EU's beef export ban is unlikely to be lifted in the short term.

"We will go on raising the issue, but we will concentrate on the domestic market, restoring confidence at home and dealing with the specific problems of the farming community," said the official. The government hopes, however, that the EU may make an exception from the export ban for Northern Ireland.

The province has had a low incidence of BSE, and is heavily dependent on beef exports.

At yesterday's meeting, the farm ministers also made a controversial bid to use a surplus of about Ecu1bn in the union's 1996 farm budget to aid the beef sector, hit badly by falling consumption.

However, they rejected proposals to cut aid to cereal farmers in order to provide the funds needed to buy up stocks of unsold beef.


Ministers set to call off cattle cull tomorrow

by Philip Webster and Charles Bremner

The Times ... September 18 1996

THE Government is poised tomorrow to call off the selective slaughter of 147,000 cattle after European ministers decided to reject Douglas Hogg's demand for a lower cull and to give no firm guarantees on the lifting of the ban on British beef.

Mr Hogg will recommend to a Cabinet committee chaired by John Major that a plan that might have been defeated in the Commons by Conservative MPs should be shelved.

Even though the decision will mean the effective collapse of the Florence deal that ended the beef war, ministers see the solution as the best way of taking the beef crisis out of the headlines.

Some European ministers will be pleased by that outcome, believing that it gives them the opportunity to escape from daily discussions about British beef.

Mr Hogg returned home from Brussels empty-handed last night. He was not surprised by his reception, described as glacial by one official, when he presented the latest scientific findings in support of Britain's proposal to cut the slaughter plan.

"Nobody even bothered to respond to him," said Karel Pinxten, the Belgian farm minister. Mr Pinxten went further than his colleagues and suggested that the European Union could withold funds already agreed to compensate British farmers for the loss of their cattle. Some £260 million of EU aid was set aside last April for the first phase of Britain's cattle cull.

But Mr Hogg's officials described that suggestion as "noises off" and said that it had not been mentioned to the minister during his talks.

Apart from abandoning the slaughter of the original 125,000 animals thought to be most at risk from BSE, ministers are also likely to shelve the idea of killing 22,000 "last born" calves earmarked for slaughter after the finding in July that BSE can be passed from cows to calves. Officials said last night that more work needed to be done on the "maternal transmission" findings.

Franz Fischler, the Agriculture Commissioner, did not support withholding compensation. But he, as well as the German and Irish Farm Ministers, told Mr Hogg that the deal for a phased lifting of the embargo, imposed last March, would be worthless if Britain backed away from its side of the bargain. "This is a precondition before any specific steps can be taken," Herr Fischler said.

Along with farm ministers, he voiced concern over what he said was the failure of Britain to start killing the cattle targeted in the selective slaughter scheme. The targeted animals, estimated at between 127,000 and 150,000, are in addition to the half million that have already been destroyed. Several of the ministers expressed their amazement that Mr Hogg had presented no specific plan when calling for a reduction of the selective cull.

Paul Tyler, the Liberal Democrat spokesman, said of the plan for the full-scale cull: "Unless Mr Hogg has come back with an absolute bankable guarantee that ... if we go ahead with the cull we can have a timetable for the end of the ban, I can't see it going through the House of Commons. Most of us from farming areas would find it extremely difficult to support a totally worthless sacrifice of healthy cows to no end, to no purpose."

Prince gives warning on intensive farming

BY ROBIN YOUNG
The Times: Britain: September 20 1996

THE Prince of Wales said last night that intensive agriculture could be undermining the health of the nation. He said that the hidden costs of intensive farming would burden future generations financially, and nutritional deficiencies in intensively produced food might rob children of intelligence.

In a lecture to the Soil Association, the champions of the organic farming methods which the Prince uses at Highgrove, he claimed that intensive farming had never provided cheap food because its real costs had never been taken into account. "We have been paying twice, not only to subsidise intensive farming through taxes, but to restore, partially, the damage that sort of farming creates."

He cited a report in the New Scientist which said that the so-called green revolution in South Asia had produced intensively grown crops so deficient in zinc and iron that "an IQ loss of ten points has been observed in a whole generation of children".

The Prince was delivering the 1997 Lady Eve Balfour Memorial Lecture at the Banqueting Hall in London. Lady Eve was a founder of the Soil Association. The National Farmers' Union said that the Prince had highlighted the debate but was too pessimistic. "His view is a gloomy one which would not be recognisable to most farmers, who take a great pride in their environmental achievements."

Rapid rise in number of cancer sufferers

BY JEREMY LAURANCE
The Times: Britain: September 20 1996

THE number of people suffering from cancer is increasing sharply, figures published yesterday disclosed. Deaths from cancer have also risen. New cases of the disease in women rose by 30 per cent between 1979 and 1991, from 83,100 to 107,900. In men new cases rose by 21 per cent from 86,200 to 104,200.

The Office of National Statistics, which published the figures, said some of the increase in new cases was attributable to the ageing of the population. After allowing for this, the rise was estimated at 20 per cent among women and 10 per cent among men. The increase emerged partly as a result of better diagnosis and improved registration.

The figures show that more than half of all cancers occurred in those aged between 65 and 79. Only 6 per cent of cancers in men and 9 per cent in women occurred in those under 45. There were 1,200 cancers in children under 15, one third of them leukaemia.



Dutch calves held at British port

By David Brown, Agriculture Editor

Daily Telegraph ... Thursday 19 September 1996

Dutch calves sent to Britain for slaughter were held for several hours at Dover yesterday while Ministry of Agriculture vets investigated where they came from.

The 51 calves arrived on board the Cap Afrique, which was making a return journey after shipping British lambs to the Continent. They were the latest foreign animals to be sent to Britain to enable Continental farmers to take advantage of special subsidies in Britain to slaughter unwanted calves under 10 months old. The scheme was introduced as part of measures to resolve the beef crisis. Britain is one of the few countries operating it and French calves have already been sent here for slaughter. The Ministry of Agriculture has asked the European Commission to investigate the legality of the trade. After ministry vets checked the documents and the ear tagging arrangements for the calves, they were allowed to continue their journey. It is believed they were en route to an abattoir in Lancashire.

Until the beef crisis broke on March 20 there was a valuable market for young calves on veal production farms in Europe. Britain used to send up to 500,000 calves to the Continent every year. Now calves are trickling across the Channel to Britain to join hundreds of thousands of others which are being destroyed.


Brittan attacked for BSE 'distortion'

By Caroline Southey in Brussels

Financial Times ... Saturday September 21 1996

Mr Franz Fischler, EU agriculture commissioner, yesterday attacked Sir Leon Brittan, commissioner for trade, over his attempts to influence UK press coverage of the mad cow crisis.

In a scathing letter, Mr Fischler rebuked Sir Leon for press briefings by his staff on Wednesday which led to media reports suggesting the government had won a "reprieve" from the Commission. He suggested that Sir Leon was acting like a "white knight" to aid the government.

Reports in UK newspapers the next day suggested that the Commission had softened its position by agreeing to re-examine evidence from Oxford scientists that the planned cull of more than 125,000 cattle was not necessary.

The reports included comments said to have been made by Mr Fischler at a meeting of commissioners - normally considered closed-door affairs.

"The stance you took with the UK press, apart from suffering from a certain lack of solidarity, is more likely to be counter-productive in terms of UK/EU relations than to clear the air, because it raises expectations that neither the Council (of ministers) nor the Commission can meet," the letter said.

Mr Fischler went on to defend his own role in the BSE affair. "After what I have done to help find an honourable solution on BSE I cannot accept that the Commission's position be distorted as it was and that I be seen (together with the president [Jacques Santer]) as reluctant to help the UK and ready to cave in to pressure from a white knight coming to the UK government's rescue," he wrote.

EU officials denied the row would have broader implications for the Commission's BSE policy. "This is simply a spat between commissioners," one said. "In a Commission of 20 Sir Leon is admired as a brilliant lone ranger. But you have to have a few friends around. He forgets that sometimes."

The reports appeared as the British cabinet ditched plans to kill more than 125,000 cattle most at risk from BSE - one of the pre-conditions for lifting the ban on beef exports. It used the Oxford report to justify abandoning the cull.

The reports coincided with an attack on Eurosceptics by former Conservative ministers. The group included Sir Leon.

Mr Fischler pointed out that the Oxford report had been sent to EU vets two weeks ago.

He added that other recent evidence that BSE could be transmitted from cow to calf would prompt calls for a larger rather than a smaller cull.



Germans stand firm on beef ban

by Peter Conradi and SteveConnor

Sunday Times ... September 22 1996

Germany ruled out any compromise with the government over the BSE crisis last night by warning that its ban on imports of British beef would not be lifted until the disease was "completely eliminated" in Britain.

The statements by Jochen Borchert, the German farm minister, are the most forthright by any of its government spokesmen and mean the ban could remain into the next century. Even the most conservative estimates suggest BSE will not be eradicated from the British herd until 2001.

In an interview in the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag this weekend, Borchert said: "As long as there is the risk of BSE in England, there will be no relaxation of our import ban. My European colleagues see things the same way: if the slaughter plan is not adhered to, then the ban remains." Germany has led European Union resistance to any lifting of the beef ban and reacted with horror when the government announced on Thursday that it was putting on hold the slaughter of up to 147,000 animals agreed by John Major at the Florence summit in June.

Although the European commission has vowed to keep the ban, its experts are prepared to consider the findings of Oxford scientists who said BSE would die out whether or not a cull took place.

This weekend Tony Blair was deciding whether to demand the recall of parliament to debate the BSE crisis. He was conferring with Donald Dewar, his chief whip, about whether to push for a Commons explanation of why the Florence deal is being abandoned.

"We do not want to disrupt anyone's party conference, but there are opportunities when the Commons could meet, such as on the Monday before the Tory conference begins on October 8," said a Blair aide. "If the indications grow that the ban on exports is likely to remain, then we could demand a recall of parliament."